Lee Anne Raper is living the North American life along another border, the one that separates Canada and the U.S. A nurse at the Henry Ford Hospital close to downtown Detroit, Raper doesn’t live in Detroit. Actually, she doesn’t even live in the United States. For the past 19 years, she has driven to work every day across the Ambassador Bridge from her home in Windsor, Ontario, a trip of only about six miles.

“I can see where I live from the 17th story of the hospital,” she says. “I actually know some of the (border) guards. They call me by name and ask me if I’m going to work.”

Raper is just one of about 800 Canadian nurses who cross the border every day to work in the U.S. These border-hopping nurses highlight some of the similarities but also the differences between the economies of the two North American neighbors that share a 5,525-mile border and enjoy one of the world’s longest-standing and most amicable relationships.

Bashing trade has always been assumed to be good politics, never more so than during this U.S. election cycle. However researchers at Georgetown University have done the math, showing exactly how anti-trade rhetoric translates into victory at the voting booth.

Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have said they would significantly alter – or even rip up – key agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

That kind of rhetoric resonates with a segment of voters – low-skilled, highly paid manufacturing workers, whose jobs are at the highest risk of being outsourced to lower cost jurisdictions overseas – that have an extraordinary amount of influence when it comes to Electoral College votes.

Sarah Reid

Sarah Reid

Clips

Sarah Reid

North America Works -- Part III: Detroit/Windsor border-hopping nurses

Anti-trade rhetoric is key to U.S. electoral success, study shows, but rarely translates to action

Sarah Reid